Even the pasta from the organic speciality shop cannot be produced without genetic engineering
The EU is currently debating the regulation of new plant breeding methods. The discussion is also underway in Germany. The knowledge magazine Terra X has taken this discussion as an opportunity to look at the topic in more detail.
Wednesday, October 27, 2021
The science magazine Terra X took this discussion as an opportunity to look at the topic in more detail. The programme shows how far-reaching the opportunities of genome editing are, especially in view of rapidly changing environmental conditions. Above all, however, it becomes clear how contradictory the current regime is: for example, food is already being sold today under the organic label that has been bred by intervening in the genome of plants (undirected mutagenesis). The programme was probably also an eye-opener for many a convinced organic consumer.
Mutation and genetic engineering: when lawyers decide on scientific issues
For a long time it was taken for granted. The same regulations apply to plants from mutation breeding as to those from conventional breeding: none except for plant variety rights.
In July 2018, however, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that mutagenesis with radiation or chemicals also leads to a "genetically modified organism" (GMO), as "a change to the genetic material of an organism that is not possible in the natural way is carried out". At the same time, plants (and animals) produced in this way are exempt from the provisions applicable under genetic engineering law, such as authorisation and labelling requirements. The ECJ judges justify this with the long experience that has been gained with mutation breeding. It is therefore justified to regard the resulting plants as "safe" without further testing.
This experience is lacking in the new genome editing methods. Therefore, according to the ECJ judgement, they must be regulated in exactly the same way as a GMO. A genome-edited plant is subject to the same authorisation and labelling regulations as a genetically modified plant. Mutation breeding with random, individually unknown genetic changes is generally considered safe because the process has been used for a long time.
Genome editing, which is based on a precise mutation at a precisely known location in the genome, is categorised by the ECJ as "novel" and the plants bred with it as unsafe - as long as the contrary is not proven. However, the ECJ judgement is not scientific expertise, but a legal interpretation of laws that were passed 25 years ago and reflect the state of science at the time, which is now long outdated. Today's scientists rightly claim that there is over 30 years of experience in the safe application of classical genetic engineering and that this can be used for even more precise genome editing.
Related articles
From molecule to crop protection product
On average, five crop protection products are approved for the market each year worldwide. Developing new products is challenging, time-consuming and expensive. It takes more than 12 years from the start of the search for a suitable substance to the approval of the market-ready product. The costs amount to more than 300 million US dollars. Every new crop protection product must meet strict requirements. The approval procedures for crop protection products are comparable to those for new drugs.
The ideological misuse of «scientific» studies
Science serves as a basis for political decisions, including in nature conservation. However, a key question is: how trustworthy are the underlying studies and data? An article in the «NZZ am Sonntag» and the explanations provided by Quarks offer revealing perspectives on the quality of scientific studies and the possible misuse of figures.
How can biodiversity be protected effectively?
Biodiversity is essential to life. And it is currently a very topical issue. The obligation to set aside areas of Swiss farmland for biodiversity promotion has clearly not achieved the desired objectives. Recently published studies indicate that species diversity remains under pressure. This is what prompted swiss-food, in the latest of its series of talks with three established experts, to focus on the tensions between biodiversity and agriculture and to shed some light on the reasons for these.
Why AI has not yet had its breakthrough in agriculture
Artificial intelligence is gaining ground in many areas. However, the new technology does not yet seem to have really arrived in agriculture. The reason for this is nature, which is throwing a spanner in the works of AI. Nevertheless, the opportunities that AI could offer agriculture are immense.