Climate change requires precision breeding
Central Europe is becoming hotter and drier due to climate change. We need robust new crop varieties to protect harvests against invasive pests. Innovative methods, such as precision breeding using gene editing, can help growers keep pace with climate change.
Wednesday, October 27, 2021
The rise in average global temperatures is increasing the likelihood of extreme weather events, such as heat waves and persistent droughts, but also heavy rain and floods. For farmers, these weather conditions often mean crop losses. Persistent heat causes crops like wheat to mature too early, while too much moisture can lead to fungal diseases. However, rising temperatures lead to more than just volatile weather conditions. Harmful organisms from warmer regions are suddenly able to thrive in places that used to be too cold. Since 1960, insect pests have been moving north at an average of 2.7 kilometers per year.
Rising temperatures cause massive crop losses
With an increase in average temperatures, pests have not only spread, but also become more biologically active. In other words, they remain active for a longer period of time and reproduce more vigorously. A model study at the University of Washington predicts that crop losses caused by insect pests will increase by 46 percent, assuming a 2-degree temperature increase. The relevant figures for corn and rice are 31 and 19 percent, respectively. Global crop losses would be enormous. Higher temperatures also facilitate the spread of crop diseases caused by viruses, fungi and bacteria. In addition, changes in environmental conditions encourage the development of mutants.
Megatrend: Climate change
Time is short
Plant protection products will not be available soon enough to combat every pest and every disease. Moreover, in many cases – for example when the harmful organism is located in the core – pesticides should not be used. What we need most of all in order to maintain productivity are robust new plant varieties that are resistant to extreme weather and new kinds of pests. The problem is that traditional breeding methods take a long time. In most cases, ten years or more go by between the first crossbreeding and the time when a new variety is ready for the market. If plant breeding is to keep pace with climate change, we need new and innovative processes. One such process is precision breeding using molecular biology.
Farmers need a complete set of tools
With the CRISPR/Cas9 gene scissors, it is possible to «cut» a crop’s genetic material more precisely than ever before. Certain genes that are detrimental to the plant can be «switched off.» The major advantage of this technology: The breeding of new varieties can be accomplished much more quickly. Since genetic material can be modified very precisely, it is no longer necessary to spend years backcrossing with old varieties. A single characteristic – such as resistance to a certain disease – can be added to an established variety, or a trait can be eliminated. What’s clear is that Farmers need a complete set of tools if they are to continue to achieve high yields. And openness to new technologies is crucial. Otherwise, Europe and Switzerland risk falling behind in the production of agricultural goods.
Sources
Genetic engineering in organic pasta?
The TV program Terra X, broadcast by the German ZDF network, is exploring whether precision breeding methods like CRISPR/Cas can contribute to more sustainable, diverse and climate-resistant agriculture. It is also looking at why we are consuming genetically modified plants even when we shop in organic food stores.
People are open to genetic engineering
A recent study conducted by gfs.bern shows that the oft-cited skepticism of the Swiss regarding genetic engineering is actually a myth. When respondents are aware of a technology’s concrete benefits, they are more willing to accept it. A large majority believe that gene editing is beneficial if it protects plants from mildew or fire blight.
Related articles
When surveys create fear
Surveys on technologies such as genetic engineering often focus on risks and spread panic instead of promoting a balanced discussion of the pros and cons. A striking example is the environmental indicator of the Federal Statistical Office. Social scientist Angela Bearth is highly critical of the survey.
More agrobiodiversity thanks to genome editing
It is often wrongly claimed that new breeding technologies such as genome editing restrict diversity in the seed market. A new study shows that the opposite is the case. Genome editing promotes agrobiodiversity.
Genetic engineering has long been on Swiss plates
As a consumer, you often don't know: products advertised as GMO-free have long contained genetic engineering. This is a thorn in the side of opponents of genetic engineering. But it is easier to keep quiet about the ‘scandal’ – because something we have been eating for a long time no longer scares us.
Migros and the opportunities of genome editing
The demand for new breeding technologies is growing. Experts see an urgent need for action in order to utilise technological progress without jeopardising safety. Companies such as Migros also recognise the importance of these developments and are addressing the opportunities and challenges they bring. Meanwhile, contrary to scientific findings, opponents are continuing to tell the same horror stories as they did 30 years ago.