«Agriculture plays a major role»
Jan Grenz is a lecturer at the School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (HAFL). In his text he looks at the historical development of the term «sustainability» and shows that ultimately everyone must contribute to a more sustainable environment.
Friday, September 17, 2021
An internet search for «sustainable agriculture» yields 301 000 hits. One of them is Article 104 of the Swiss Federal Constitution, according to which the federal government must ensure «sustainable and market oriented production.» Another is by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, which presents the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, including Goal 2: «End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.» Many of the results are for companies, including Syngenta, John Deere, Fenaco and a number of dairy companies.
So why add yet another article? Because it's worth taking a look at the roots of sustainability. The term has been used throughout history. In 1713, Hans Carl von Carlowitz, the chief mining administrator for Germany’s Erzgebirge mountains, published the book «Sylvicultura oeconomica» about the «sustainable use» of forests. At the time, ore mines, smelters and a growing population needed ever increasing amounts of wood, and a wood shortage loomed. Carlowitz promoted the idea of not removing more wood from the forest than what could regrow during the same period. While this may seem obvious, it requires precise knowledge of growth and timber extraction. This was achieved through measurements, mapping, monitoring and bans. There was another reason why pressure on forests did not increase despite economic and population growth: The rise of coal-fired machines. Coal deposits had to be exploited, but they did not have to be maintained like forests. Sustainability was not a concern on the new industries.
Despite significant progress, agriculture in the time of our great grandparents around 1900 was vastly different from where it is now. A third of the population was involved in agriculture. Most of the 240,000 farms had five hectares of land or less, and many were used for subsistence farming. The hectares yielded a ton of wheat or five tons of potatoes, the cow provided 2,800 kilograms of milk. Tractors, nitrogen fertilizer, antibiotics, radio, cars and vacation travel were future concepts. At the time, a twenty-year-old man had a life expectancy at birth of around 40 years, and child mortality was high. Chemical fertilizers, tractors and pesticides slowly brought the industrial era to the land. Agriculture became a capital-intensive profession. Some were uncomfortable with the dependency on industry and capital, which led to the rise of organic farming. Many ideas for healthy farming and food were tried. At the time, no one used the forestry term «sustainable.»
Developments accelerated and people acquired ever more material things. A household had about 180 objects in it in 1900 – today we have 10,000. We use eight times as much energy, live twice as long, get eight times as much from the land and three times as much from cows. We live in a climate that is warmer by 1.8°C and release thousands of tons of nutrients into the environment each year. The fact that the price of well-being would be so high was discussed as far back as the 1970s. This led to a rebirth of sustainability in politics. In 1987, the World Commission on Environment and Development said that sustainable development must do both things: It must meet the needs of all people, including those in the future. And it must protect our natural resources. At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, nearly all countries committed themselves to sustainable development and they continue to follow sustainability goals today. While the population and the economy have grown enormously since the time of Carlowitz, the proportion of people working in agriculture has fallen to 3 percent and agriculture’s share of economic output has declined to 0.6 percent. Some see an imbalance here, viewing agriculture as a sector that causes a lot of pollution while contributing little economically. This is a misguided view. Agriculture represents our greatest connection with the natural environment and is inseparably linked with society as a whole. In a hundred-story skyscraper, no one would criticize the residents of the ground floor for how they use their land or for the fact that water enters the building and wastewater departs it through their floor.
Agriculture plays a major role in achieving sustainable development. But we are all responsible for here. Organic and integrated agriculture are two systems in Switzerland that effectively help to achieve sustainable agriculture and that enable consumers to assume responsibility. There are also a number of success stories. We can learn how to overcome the coming crises from these stories. For example, we still need to measure, map, monitor and ban. But above all, we will only develop in a sustainable way only if we do it together.
Jan Grenz is a lecturer at the School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (HAFL). This article was first published in the anniversary supplement to «Schweizer Bauer» on September 11, 2021.
Journalist, publicist, publisher and historian
Head of Knowledge Team Tamedia
Babette Sigg Frank
President of the Swiss Consumer Forum (KF)
Country President Syngenta Switzerland
Journalist at Lebensmittel Zeitung
Development Editor-in-Chief Agrar-Medien
“Ecological methods alone won’t cut it”
Columnist at Genetic Literacy Project and AGDaily
CEO Syngenta Group
President of Syngenta Crop Protection
Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine
Professor of Crop Science, ETH Zurich
Head of Biotechnology at Scienceindustries
Lecturer in Sustainability, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL
Agricultural scientist and president of Agroecology Science
Professor of Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich
Head of Nutrition and Agriculture at scienceindustries
Dr. Teresa Koller
Researcher at the Institute of Plant and Microbiology at the University of Zurich
Professor for Molecular Plant Breeding, ETH Zurich
Editor-in-Chief of «die grüne» magazine
Head of Business Sustainability, Syngenta Switzerland
It is essential that society has confidence in research. Only in this way can it realise its maximum potential and ultimately overcome social challenges such as climate change or a pandemic. But there are also critical voices: Some of the Swiss population has little or no trust in science. Four experts debated how research can gain people's trust at an «NZZ Live» panel discussion.
Vegetable producers are currently struggling. The reason for this is the lack of crop protection products . It is becoming increasingly difficult to bring saleable products onto the market. Some farmers are even reaching their limits to such an extent that they have had to stop growing certain vegetable varieties.
Fruit, berry and wine growing is increasingly threatened by pests such as the Japanese beetle, the spotted wing drosophila and the Mediterranean fruit fly. Producers are sounding the alarm – but there is a lack of pesticides that can put an end to the pests.
The high number of plant protection treatments is a major challenge for organic farmers. One of them is apple grower Marco Messerli from Kirchdorf BE. He has had to treat susceptible apple varieties with organic pesticides a total of 48 times. Too much, he thinks, and is now calling for the authorisation of new breeding methods. Experts agree with him.